Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Shelf Life On Promethazine



Poster Battleship Potemkin

The Russian Revolution (1917) launched a major creative period in
new Soviet Russia that emerged from it, but two areas stood out for its international influence, the arts (in painting highlighted Malevich Suprematism who took a step further cubism and abstraction) and the silent film .

The most influential Russian filmmakers Sergei Eisenstein was , reflecting a very innovative way for the Suppression of tsarist military apparatus against the people in this scene from the film Battleship Potemkin , recounting the events of the 1905 revolution in fleet Black Sea port city of Odessa.

In these images and in general in the Russian cinema of the 20's is of paramount importance the assembly sequences and planes , his great contribution to the history of cinema, with the aim not only tell the story through many planes inserted following a very marked rhythm, also seeks to viewer's feelings emerge and generate emotions.

Moreover, these films also had a didactic purpose (more than two thirds of the Russian population were illiterate), and political course since it is also a propaganda vehicle of the new Soviet regime, showing the just struggle of the people and the crew of the Potemkin against Tsarist tyranny (clear history of the October Revolution of 1917).




as you see in this small part (in total lasts longer than 7 minutes) from the known sequence of steps in Odessa, rhythm and emotion is achieved by alternating close-ups (faces, picture of the child) and general (soldiers, the masses running down the stairs) and making the viewer suffers because of the imminent collapse of the stroller, which adds to the fantastic music of Shostakovich.

There is only one word: Awesome . So much so that not infrequently has covered this part, perhaps the best known is in the movie which stars Kevin Costner and Sean Connery: The Untouchables .

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Using A Temporary License To Get Into Bar

North Korea: An anachronistic system


     Cuando analizamos el final de la Guerra Fría se suele dar por concluida a principios de los años 90 del siglo XX: gracias a la caída del muro de Berlín (1989) y la desaparición de los regímenes comunistas que conformaban el bloque soviético, en especial la desitegración de la propia URSS; sin embargo, en pleno siglo XXI aún pervive un conflicto latente heredero de las relaciones internacionales que marcaron la segunda mitad del siglo pasado, nos referimos a las tensiones nucleares en Corea del Norte.

     The Stalinist regime that remains in North Korea takes us back over 50 years of history that even if certain peculiarities remains huge similarities with the Soviet Union of Josef Stalin's time and continues to position its own international policy block, as its nuclear obsession, paranoia of external threat and the continual demonstrations of military power, as the last missile ( click here to see the news ).




The origin of this area of \u200b\u200bconflict in East Asia is to be found at the end of World War 2 in 1945, after Japan's defeat and occupation of the Korean peninsula by the two superpowers (the United States and the Soviet Union) to star in the so-called Cold War . The distribution of influence around the parallel 38 º set two states, North supported by the USSR and then, since 1949, also the China of Mao Zedong and the south under a dictatorship supported by the U.S. president Harry Truman. Soon the two Koreas staged the first of indirect confrontation between communist and capitalist blocs, is called Korean War (1950-1953) that after reaching an armistice not only changed the situation, despite the destruction and loss of lives, never came to establish a lasting peace.






















Picture of Great Leader Kim Il Sung Image " daddy" Stalin
; Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) was founded during the reign of Kim Il Sung through the creation of a repressive state following a Stalinist policy, characterized by the framework of the masses and social strict discipline executed by the Communists, led by the Party of Workers are in Korea. This policy, based on a propaganda present in all areas of the exalted life of Kim Il Sung as Great Leader of the socialist revolution in Korea , like Stalin in the USSR, generating an enormous cult of personality leader, who "never wrong ".

wreath at a large statue of Kim Il Sung

Through a strict education in schools, a total control of the media and a studied manipulation of reality, promoted the idea of \u200b\u200bdemigod the leader in the Korean case even led to the succession by his son, current supreme leader of the country since 1994, Kim Jong Il (using the image of his father to entrench themselves in office as did Stalin with Lenin), created the first communist dictatorship hereditary in the world and which some analysts believe can continue (noting this as the source of the recent military escalation in the country).























military demonstration
Pyongyang Kim Jong Il, North Korean top leader



















You can see a very instructive story of the current reality of North Korea, made in secret by Jon Sistiaga, cock this link:
North Korea has lived these past 60 years without hardly any changes under a repressive regime that has created concentration camps for reeducation of dissidents (like the Soviet gulags) maintaining strict social control, under a planned state economy focused on heavy industry that has produced occasional starvation among the population, and to promote isolation from the outside to avoid any influence (their inhabitants can not access the internet). This situation leads to talk about collective brainwashing and reflected in the major stops and parades where huge numbers of North Koreans involved.

mass parade in Kim Il Sung Square

Moreover, the totalitarian regime of Kim Jong Il has developed an exacerbated militarism, inheritance Cold War era, auzando to the people the idea of \u200b\u200bexternal threat and investing major resources in the production of missiles and nuclear weapons (first in the world in military spending relative to GDP, 25%). This situation endangers the stability of the region and frightens its neighbors South Korea (ruining the progress made in normalizing relations) and Japan, worrying U.S. and the UN, which is powerless to stop the escalation of voltage acc, despite the imposition of sanctions .

To learn more about North Korea can visit these pages:

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

What Do U Need To Get An New York State Id

electoral law in Spain

One of the most debated issues in elections in Spain is the manner in which seats are allocated to the Congress of Deputies and its consequences, especially if neither of the two major national parties PSOE (English Socialist Workers Party) and PP (Partido Popular) obtained an absolute majority although the system itself is designed to encourage obtaining majorities.


current English electoral law combines the general standards established by the 1978 Constitution in Articles 68 and 69 and Organic Law 5 / 1985 of 19 June on the General Electoral Regime . The main feature is the electoral system for the Congress of Deputies is the establishment of 50 provinces and 2 autonomous cities as constituency with a minimum of 2 representatives from each of them, dividing the rest of members in terms of population up to 350.
This greatly affects the distribution of MPs as it produces imbalances even though attempts to compensate, so for example there is an over-representation in provinces with small populations (eg Soria and Teruel ) over-representation of highly populated provinces (Madrid, Barcelona). This fact is said sometimes that not all seats are worth the same amount of votes.



Moreover, it is also essential to the combination of the provinces with the circuscripción D'Hont Act, which is used Members allocate between the parties that have obtained more than 3% of the votes in that province. The D'Hondt system performance is relatively easy to understand through an example, click to view here.
The consequence of this electoral system is the difference in the results for a single constituency proportional system which causes the small national parties go badly hit as IU (Izquierda Unida) against the major parties get more Members with the lowest number of votes and an absolute majority allowing only 40% of the total votes, whereas parties Nationalists remain at similar values. You can see a table comparing the last two elections on the following websites: